GSIG mirrors the published designations of every principal sanctioning authority — OFAC, NBCTF, UN Security Council, FCDO/OFSI, EU CFSP, and the major national authorities globally. Designations are reconciled into a single compliance schema with provenance preserved on every record.
The published lists are the floor. From there, GSIG identifies sanctions-network behaviour at 220× the volume of what any government authority has designated. The list is the input, not the output.
Each designating authority publishes onchain addresses in its own format, cadence, and language. GSIG mirrors and reconciles them continuously into a single compliance schema, with confidence scoring and provenance preserved on every record. This is the published baseline against which every GSIG screening engagement runs.
All designations reconciled · Provenance preserved · Continuous refresh
Mirroring the regulators' lists is the starting point. Threat actors operate through addresses that, by design, do not appear on those lists. Pass-through wallets, peel chains, exchange operational addresses, mixer-adjacent flows, and the working infrastructure of services that transact for designated counterparties — almost none of these appear on any public list. They are visible only through topology-level intelligence that conventional screening does not produce.
Every GSIG screening engagement begins with the regulator floor and extends through topology-level attribution, cross-chain entity resolution, behavioural pattern detection, and continuous threat-network monitoring. The 1,341 actively designated wallets are the starting input. The 294,665 sanctions-adjacent wallets are what GSIG produces from them.
GSIG operates across the principal blockchain settlement infrastructure where threat finance moves. Coverage is continuously reviewed and extended as new venues, bridges, and stablecoin rails emerge.
Specific coverage detail — chains, surveillance methodology, attribution depth, and signal weighting — is reviewed under engagement. Public disclosure of operational coverage is deliberately limited.
Risk colour is reserved language. A finding is never coloured for emphasis — only for classification, and always paired with a tier label.
Colour is never the only carrier of meaning · GSIG Brand v1.0
Under the emerging frameworks — MiCA in the EU, GENIUS in the US, the FATF travel rule globally, MiCAR transposition across member states — designation is converging toward harmonised standards rather than each authority publishing granular onchain enforcement.
The same convergence happened with FATCA and CRS in traditional finance. Regulators move from publishing detailed lists to declaring "we adhere to the harmonised standard." Operational compliance burden shifts to the institutions that intermediate the flow.
GSIG is built for that environment. The published list will continue to be the floor. The intelligence layer above it will be where compliance actually happens.